Backlog #1143

Improved ONE CLI Range Commands

Added by Anonymous over 9 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:02/26/2012
Priority:HighDue date:
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:CLIEstimated time:1.00 hour
Target version:-

Description

Currently, the "onevm" CLI tool's range behavior is less than idea for handling spare ID numbers.

ISSUE:

When executing a range command, say the following command:
oneadmin@opennebula-server:/home/hbetts$ onevm stop 73..137

It attempts to execute "stop" on each VM starting with VMID 73 and progressing to VMID 137.

However, if there are any VMIDs not used within that range, or are in the wrong state, the following error is shown:
[VirtualMachineAction] Wrong state to perform action

EXAMPLE:
oneadmin@opennebula-server:/home/hbetts$ onevm stop 73..137
[VirtualMachineAction] Wrong state to perform action
[VirtualMachineAction] Wrong state to perform action
[VirtualMachineAction] Wrong state to perform action
[VirtualMachineAction] Wrong state to perform action
[VirtualMachineAction] Wrong state to perform action

IDs that were skipped:
ID STATE
73 stop
76 stop
79 stop
135 stop
137 stop

IMPROVEMENT
Either of the two options would be nice:
(1) There should be a flag that is set for range commands such that VMs that are not in the proper state are skipped over, with no error messages printed.
(2) A command line flag should be available, instructing the tool to not print warnings for VMs which are within the range but are already in the proper state.

For large ID ranges, those warnings could be extensive. Also, I don't know how ranges react to VMIDs which are not under the control of the user executing the range command. All my tests were conducted with the "oneadmin" user.


Related issues

Related to Feature #1353: Improve CLI commands Closed 07/12/2012

History

#1 Updated by Ruben S. Montero over 7 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Feature to Backlog
  • Status changed from New to Pending
  • Priority changed from Low to High

#2 Updated by Ruben S. Montero over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending to Closed

The ID is now printed in the message, and stderr would be redirected. We believe the current, is the standard error behavior...

Also available in: Atom PDF