Virtual Networks shouldn't be overwritten if a new with same name is created
|Assignee:||Tino Vázquez||% Done:|
|Category:||Core & System|
|Target version:||Release 2.0|
Uniqueness should be define by ID, NAME, USER; and not by ID and NAME as it is now
#2 Updated by Tino Vázquez about 11 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Resolution set to fixed
This has been tackled in branch-206, now merged in master since e86c0f07ebc9d08bfcc4cfc0d334b78bbb4fb88b.
Now the behavior dictates that a new network allocation with the same name as a previously existing one will fail.